<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flex2 Opinions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.gtuhl.com/2007/03/28/flex2-opinions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.gtuhl.com/2007/03/28/flex2-opinions/</link>
	<description>Development, IT, Gadgets, and Startups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:53:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flex Remoting in Ruby? Easy Choice. &#171; Rob&#8217;s Blog - Technology, Atlanta, Startups and Stuff</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtuhl.com/2007/03/28/flex2-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Flex Remoting in Ruby? Easy Choice. &#171; Rob&#8217;s Blog - Technology, Atlanta, Startups and Stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 02:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gtuhl.nfshost.com/blog/?p=12#comment-237</guid>
		<description>[...] with Adobe Flex.  An awkward attempt to migrate an existing app to Flex caused several strong reactions and cost a good bit of developer goodwill.  The details of that decision are messy and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with Adobe Flex.  An awkward attempt to migrate an existing app to Flex caused several strong reactions and cost a good bit of developer goodwill.  The details of that decision are messy and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psychic medium lori</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtuhl.com/2007/03/28/flex2-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>psychic medium lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 14:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gtuhl.nfshost.com/blog/?p=12#comment-117</guid>
		<description>angeles medium psychic &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.grab.com/dimik123&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;medium charlotte psychic&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>angeles medium psychic <a href="http://blogs.grab.com/dimik123" rel="nofollow">medium charlotte psychic</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtuhl.com/2007/03/28/flex2-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 11:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gtuhl.nfshost.com/blog/?p=12#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Hi Joe, hi guys...

I liked a lot this discussion. I&#039;m looking for a new tool / technology to develop RIA applications too.

Recently I watched an apresentation of Delphi for PHP, by Code Gear (Borland), and I think it can be a good tool. 

Does anyone had heared about it ? If yes, what do you think ?

Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joe, hi guys&#8230;</p>
<p>I liked a lot this discussion. I&#8217;m looking for a new tool / technology to develop RIA applications too.</p>
<p>Recently I watched an apresentation of Delphi for PHP, by Code Gear (Borland), and I think it can be a good tool. </p>
<p>Does anyone had heared about it ? If yes, what do you think ?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gtuhl</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtuhl.com/2007/03/28/flex2-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>gtuhl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gtuhl.nfshost.com/blog/?p=12#comment-28</guid>
		<description>There are a lot of tools out there and no one approach is completely superior to the others so it can be pretty difficult to select a technology and feel 100% comfortable with the decision.

For now we just have to try and match tools per project based on the differences between them and it doesn&#039;t ever feel easy to objectively do this.

At least the current situation prevents us from running out of things to learn :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of tools out there and no one approach is completely superior to the others so it can be pretty difficult to select a technology and feel 100% comfortable with the decision.</p>
<p>For now we just have to try and match tools per project based on the differences between them and it doesn&#8217;t ever feel easy to objectively do this.</p>
<p>At least the current situation prevents us from running out of things to learn <img src='http://blog.gtuhl.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtuhl.com/2007/03/28/flex2-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 10:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gtuhl.nfshost.com/blog/?p=12#comment-27</guid>
		<description>What this says to me is that it is about time for a technology change.  This whole &quot;mashed up&quot; mess we so lovingly call internet techonologes is out of control.  Looking at it objectively the whole &quot;java, html, javascript, taglibs, ejb, spring, jsf, ..... Blah, blah, blah&quot;  mess is just wrong.  On the other side you go the &quot;RIA, flex, openLazlo,.... whatever&quot; and you end up with a half constructed, immature technology that requires a propriatory download.  Surely, there has to be a cleaner technology out there that will satisfy the needs of the opensource community that is both single, unifying and extensible.  

Please excuse my rantings .... I haven&#039;t had a coffee yet. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What this says to me is that it is about time for a technology change.  This whole &#8220;mashed up&#8221; mess we so lovingly call internet techonologes is out of control.  Looking at it objectively the whole &#8220;java, html, javascript, taglibs, ejb, spring, jsf, &#8230;.. Blah, blah, blah&#8221;  mess is just wrong.  On the other side you go the &#8220;RIA, flex, openLazlo,&#8230;. whatever&#8221; and you end up with a half constructed, immature technology that requires a propriatory download.  Surely, there has to be a cleaner technology out there that will satisfy the needs of the opensource community that is both single, unifying and extensible.  </p>
<p>Please excuse my rantings &#8230;. I haven&#8217;t had a coffee yet. <img src='http://blog.gtuhl.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luxspes</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtuhl.com/2007/03/28/flex2-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Luxspes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gtuhl.nfshost.com/blog/?p=12#comment-26</guid>
		<description>If only swing could make it easier to build stuff like https://aerith.dev.java.net/ ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only swing could make it easier to build stuff like <a href="https://aerith.dev.java.net/" rel="nofollow">https://aerith.dev.java.net/</a> &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luxspes</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtuhl.com/2007/03/28/flex2-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Luxspes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gtuhl.nfshost.com/blog/?p=12#comment-25</guid>
		<description>And, well, I dont want to goo the CSS/HTML/JScript way...
I guess, that as you found Flex unconfortable when compared with the CSS/HTML/JScript way... I find the CSS/HTML/JScript way unconfortable when compared with &quot;SmartClient&quot; way (WindowsForms.NET/Swing)... but the sad part is that building Heavy/Smart Client is not... &quot;in fashion&quot; right now... but I do feel that it would be sooo much easier...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, well, I dont want to goo the CSS/HTML/JScript way&#8230;<br />
I guess, that as you found Flex unconfortable when compared with the CSS/HTML/JScript way&#8230; I find the CSS/HTML/JScript way unconfortable when compared with &#8220;SmartClient&#8221; way (WindowsForms.NET/Swing)&#8230; but the sad part is that building Heavy/Smart Client is not&#8230; &#8220;in fashion&#8221; right now&#8230; but I do feel that it would be sooo much easier&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luxspes</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtuhl.com/2007/03/28/flex2-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Luxspes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gtuhl.nfshost.com/blog/?p=12#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Hi!
I have been evaluating a all platforms  for RIA development that I can find... for almost one month... each time I fee like &quot;i am going to use X&quot; (where X is Flex, OLaszlo, Echo2, GWT, Ajax4JSF, etc) I find a &quot;but&quot;:
-But there is no IDE
-But the IDE is very expensive
-But there is no documentation
-But it only works with .NET
-But it only works with Java
-But it goes agaisnt standard &quot;XXXX&quot;
-But there is no debugger

In Flex case, in my experience:
-But is not as easy as it seems (as I have learned from this article)
-But DataServices are expensive
-But it uses too much RAM

So, lets go the Laszlo way:
-But, documentation is very superficial (only simple examples, no architectural guidelines, i havent been able to find something like Cairngorm)
-But if I use SOAP it SOLO Mode wont work and development/production will consume lots of RAM
-But there isn&#039;t a standard widely used REST framework in java (JSR-331 too young)
-But there isn&#039;t and IDE (no debugging, no visual designer, no refactoring)
-But it is not easy to change form SOAP to REST mode (very different code)
-But there isn&#039;t a good finished book (http://www.manning.com/klein/ look promising, but it isn&#039;t finished) with an end to end example.

So... basically, I still don&#039;t know what to do... I guess I&#039;ll find out... and blog about it when I do...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!<br />
I have been evaluating a all platforms  for RIA development that I can find&#8230; for almost one month&#8230; each time I fee like &#8220;i am going to use X&#8221; (where X is Flex, OLaszlo, Echo2, GWT, Ajax4JSF, etc) I find a &#8220;but&#8221;:<br />
-But there is no IDE<br />
-But the IDE is very expensive<br />
-But there is no documentation<br />
-But it only works with .NET<br />
-But it only works with Java<br />
-But it goes agaisnt standard &#8220;XXXX&#8221;<br />
-But there is no debugger</p>
<p>In Flex case, in my experience:<br />
-But is not as easy as it seems (as I have learned from this article)<br />
-But DataServices are expensive<br />
-But it uses too much RAM</p>
<p>So, lets go the Laszlo way:<br />
-But, documentation is very superficial (only simple examples, no architectural guidelines, i havent been able to find something like Cairngorm)<br />
-But if I use SOAP it SOLO Mode wont work and development/production will consume lots of RAM<br />
-But there isn&#8217;t a standard widely used REST framework in java (JSR-331 too young)<br />
-But there isn&#8217;t and IDE (no debugging, no visual designer, no refactoring)<br />
-But it is not easy to change form SOAP to REST mode (very different code)<br />
-But there isn&#8217;t a good finished book (<a href="http://www.manning.com/klein/" rel="nofollow">http://www.manning.com/klein/</a> look promising, but it isn&#8217;t finished) with an end to end example.</p>
<p>So&#8230; basically, I still don&#8217;t know what to do&#8230; I guess I&#8217;ll find out&#8230; and blog about it when I do&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gtuhl</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtuhl.com/2007/03/28/flex2-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>gtuhl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 19:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gtuhl.nfshost.com/blog/?p=12#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Hey Paul,

Thanks for the input.  It sounds like we are on the same page - the pricing is one of the biggest issues with the platform.  Maybe I can spend some time in the near future test driving OpenLazlo.  I have not written a single line of code in that environment so am not qualified to guess at how it stacks up to Flex2.

Good luck with your project and team,

Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Paul,</p>
<p>Thanks for the input.  It sounds like we are on the same page &#8211; the pricing is one of the biggest issues with the platform.  Maybe I can spend some time in the near future test driving OpenLazlo.  I have not written a single line of code in that environment so am not qualified to guess at how it stacks up to Flex2.</p>
<p>Good luck with your project and team,</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtuhl.com/2007/03/28/flex2-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gtuhl.nfshost.com/blog/?p=12#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I have just read your comments on Flex 2 and I have to say that I agree with you completely especially the comments regarding the pricing.  Both Flex Builder and Flex Data services are &quot;off the planet&quot; demonstrating the complete lack of reality the Adobe management team have regarding the value of their products.  I agree Flex Builder is at best a $10 product in its current beta phase. What can you say about $20K for FDS, I can understand the desire to recoup dev costs and generate profit but $20K is rediculous.  

My experience with Flex is that it works, it is not exceptional and if you don&#039;t want to do anything out of the ordinary it will continue to work.  It is definitely not a mature product and there is no doubt that OpenLazlo should be considered if you want to stick with a RIA.

My team have decided to stay with Flex but when we have time will probably port the app across to OpenLazlo in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I have just read your comments on Flex 2 and I have to say that I agree with you completely especially the comments regarding the pricing.  Both Flex Builder and Flex Data services are &#8220;off the planet&#8221; demonstrating the complete lack of reality the Adobe management team have regarding the value of their products.  I agree Flex Builder is at best a $10 product in its current beta phase. What can you say about $20K for FDS, I can understand the desire to recoup dev costs and generate profit but $20K is rediculous.  </p>
<p>My experience with Flex is that it works, it is not exceptional and if you don&#8217;t want to do anything out of the ordinary it will continue to work.  It is definitely not a mature product and there is no doubt that OpenLazlo should be considered if you want to stick with a RIA.</p>
<p>My team have decided to stay with Flex but when we have time will probably port the app across to OpenLazlo in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
